From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Sat Mar 09 08:13:41 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 9 Mar 2002 16:13:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 57020 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2002 16:13:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Mar 2002 16:13:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2002 16:13:40 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.84.66]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020309161338.EEZE7000.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:13:38 +0000 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: [jboske] Quantifiers, Existential Import, and all that stuff Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:12:51 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <81.18bb9496.29bb312a@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=77248971 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13579 pc: > I wish you'd make up your mind whether it is the things with > internal {su'o} that are + or the things that are internal {ro}, the > shifting back and forth makes this hard to follow without constantly > checking the list again, which is more effort than crazinesses > deserves. But, if {su'o broda cu brode} = {su'o lo su'o broda cu > brode} then {naku su'o broda cu brode} must be also {naku su'o lo > su'o broda cu brode} . But one of these is patently - and the other > + or else the principle here is totally arbitrary (i.e., no principle > at all). Or maybe there is one but it is so far from Lojban and > logic, that I just can't see it. I do wish you would explain how it > works (on loccan3, perhaps). {su'o broda cu brode} = {su'o lo ro broda cu brode} That then logically entails {su'o lo su'o broda cu brode}. {na ku su'o broda cu brode} = {na ku su'o lo ro broda cu brode} And that does not entail {na ku su'o lo su'o broda cu brode} "=" in these formulae means "is an abbreviation of". --And.