From rob@twcny.rr.com Tue Mar 05 14:05:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 5 Mar 2002 22:05:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 40898 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2002 01:07:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Mar 2002 01:07:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.125) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2002 01:07:38 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id g2517bu07138 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:07:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:07:35 -0500 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16i3QV-0000PI-00 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:07:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:07:35 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Letteral, letter words and symbols. Message-ID: <20020305010735.GA825@twcny.rr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2572649 X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13523 On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:33:00PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > To use {la} we'd have to say something like {la pav} and {la abus}. So THAT'S what the {bus} rafsi is for. Still doesn't justify {bu'i} being wasted in the same way, though. This refers to a previous gripe of mine, that the rafsi {bus} and {bu'i} were assigned to {bu}, which would have no conceivable purpose in a lujvo. -- la rab.spir noi sarjybu'i zo busygumri