From pycyn@aol.com Mon Apr 22 06:09:07 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 22 Apr 2002 13:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 56678 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 13:07:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2002 13:07:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m06.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.161) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 13:07:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.49.1c3e151c (4320) for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:06:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49.1c3e151c.29f564f2@aol.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:06:58 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Lists and Spam To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_49.1c3e151c.29f564f2_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14090 --part1_49.1c3e151c.29f564f2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/21/2002 6:51:48 PM Central Daylight Time, cmeclax@gmx.co.uk writes: > .i la reizr ba za pilno la nilsimsa lenu facki le ka se fesmri kei lo notci > .iju le fesmri ja'aji'a punji lo cunso lo notci .i mi cmima le la reizr > mrisi'ugri .iku'i mi na djuno le satci du'u ca makau ba fasnu > I suppose all pitches are similar to some extent, but will they be sufficiently so -- and sufficiently different from non-spam -- to give a reasonable chance of Razor being successful? In the instant cases, the message around the pitch was fairly non-random, being designed to fit in with the apparent purposes of the groups to which they were sent. --part1_49.1c3e151c.29f564f2_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/21/2002 6:51:48 PM Central Daylight Time, cmeclax@gmx.co.uk writes:


.i la reizr ba za pilno la nilsimsa lenu facki le ka se fesmri kei lo notci
.iju le fesmri ja'aji'a punji lo cunso lo notci .i mi cmima le la reizr
mrisi'ugri .iku'i mi na djuno le satci du'u ca makau ba fasnu


I suppose all pitches are similar to some extent, but will they be sufficiently so -- and sufficiently different from non-spam -- to give a reasonable chance of Razor being successful?  In the instant cases, the message around the pitch was fairly non-random, being designed to fit in with the apparent purposes of the groups to which they were sent. --part1_49.1c3e151c.29f564f2_boundary--