Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 30 Apr 2002 20:06:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 77009 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 20:06:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2002 20:06:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 20:06:09 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.90] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A9278B6024A; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:05:59 -0400
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] What's the logic behind Lojban's sound system?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:06:04 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCEEICHAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <1a8.19471a4.29ffedca@aol.com>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14184
Content-Length: 280
Lines: 9

><that weird wh some English dialects use>
>My wh adds a distinct u quality when used and thus is even worse than h --
what do other dialects use?

My dialect uses a simple w, but I know quite a few people who use a
labialized h that is neither fully h nor fully w.