From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Apr 25 13:16:54 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 25 Apr 2002 20:16:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1731 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 20:16:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Apr 2002 20:16:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 20:16:53 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.90] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A42BD61D0120; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:16:43 -0400 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] So you think you're logical? Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <126.fc1dd25.29f9ba95@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14116 ><'ro temci lo menli cu nibli'> >Also curiously prescientitic. Most time frames existed before there were any minds and so hardly entailed them, even as future existents, apparently. But I >usppose there is some logic (at least set of premises) that does make this work out. But very insightful for something generated by a computer program designed to write texts using Markov chains, no?