Return-Path: X-Sender: opoudjis@optushome.com.au X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 2 May 2002 12:05:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 55326 invoked from network); 2 May 2002 12:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 May 2002 12:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au) (210.49.20.138) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2002 12:05:03 -0000 Received: from [210.49.154.210] (c17097.brasd1.vic.optusnet.com.au [210.49.154.210]) by mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g42C51L21072 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 22:05:02 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: opoudjis@mail.optushome.com.au Message-Id: Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:04:30 +1000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: Fwd: Lojban dictionary in TEI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" From: Nick Nicholas X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90350612 X-Yahoo-Profile: opoudjis X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14198 Content-Length: 939 Lines: 18 And was indeed involved in the TEI of yore (which is the tagset I came to the States to work with, and is a force for unmitigated good --- And, have I kudos'd you enough on it?) It does include a dictionary tagset, although that was the last to be made XML-compatible. At least, I *think* it's compatible now. And of course, things have to be XML-compatible to be usable these days. What I don't know is whether that might not overlap with what Jay had already gotten started with his own work on the dictionary. We'd obviously want the one to talk to the other. doi djez. pe'ipei -- [][][][] [][][][][][][][][][] [][][][] Dr Nick Nicholas. opoudjis@optushome.com.au http://www.opoudjis.net University of Melbourne: nickn@unimelb.edu.au Chiastaxo dhe to giegnissa, i dhedhato potemu, ma ena chieri aftumeno ecratu, chisvissemu. (I Thisia tu Avraam)