From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu May 16 11:17:18 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 16 May 2002 18:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2578 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 18:17:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 May 2002 18:17:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granite.thestonecutters.net) (66.111.194.10) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2002 18:17:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4GIH4m45344 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 14:17:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:17:04 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] zgamuvjga In-Reply-To: <200205161736.NAA11895@mail.reutershealth.com> Message-ID: <20020516141519.E44426-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14279 On Thu, 16 May 2002, John Cowan wrote: > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves to x4 from x5 > > I don't understand what x3 has to do with it, frankly. I can talk about > the parallax of an object on the opposite wall from one side of a room > vs. the other side, without postulating an observer who actually moves > across the room. zo'oru'e ju'oske naldrani