From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Fri Jun 07 06:23:36 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 15035 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw5.gedas.de) (139.1.44.13) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2002 13:23:35 -0000 Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06948 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06941; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: "'John Cowan'" Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com, "Newton, Philip" Subject: Re: [lojban] How many places for lujvo? Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:27 +0200 Return-Receipt-To: "Newton, Philip" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Newton, Philip" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112 X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14353 John Cowan wrote: > Newton, Philip scripsit: > > > > And is there any mechanism analogous to the fa,fe,fi,fo,fu > > mechanism to get at places beyond the fifth? > > "faxixa", "faxire", "faxici", etc. Was that intended to be "faxixa, faxize, faxibi" or "faxipa, faxire, faxici", or was it intentionally a mixture? > You can use any other FA with the same meaning if you like. So if I want to fill, say, 2 and 3 and 7 I might use fe and fi and foxize? > New gismu are not now being defined. If one were to be added, I doubt > that it would have more than five places, but there is no principled > restriction. OK, thanks. fe'omi'e filip. -- Philip Newton All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.