From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Sat Jun 15 11:08:11 2002
Return-Path: <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
X-Sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 15 Jun 2002 18:08:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 82044 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2002 18:08:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2002 18:08:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.90)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2002 18:08:10 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.188] by n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2002 18:08:10 -0000
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 18:08:09 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Correct terminator(s)?
Message-ID: <aefvq9+ocns@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020614081011.A3623@miranda.org>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 869
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "elder_newton" <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
X-Originating-IP: 62.246.109.38
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112
X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14395

--- In lojban@y..., Jay F Kominek <jkominek-yahoo@m...> wrote:
> I feel it is worth pointing out exactly which things each of those
> terminators terminate.
> 
> le
> | nu
> | | mi
> | | tcidu
> | | le
> | | | cukta
> | | ku
> | kei
> ku

Ah, thanks.

> Still wrong. "nu ... kei" is a selbri, which in the above case forms
> a tanru with "se skicu".

Thanks for this explanation, too.

> le nu mi tcidu le cukta kei ku se skicu mi do
> 
> Is correct. The 'kei' terminates the bridi inside of nu, which also
> does the job of terminating 'le cukta'. Then the 'ku' terminates the
> 'le' before that, preventing 'nu ... kei' from modifying 'se skicu'.
> 
> 
> A tad outside of the scope of the original question, but I felt it
> was worth explaining what was going on. (And I hope I did so.)

Appreciated, thanks.

mu'omi'e filip.
[email copies appreciated]