From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Jun 18 11:09:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 18 Jun 2002 18:09:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 79210 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 18:09:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2002 18:09:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2002 18:09:48 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.182] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A7505F54008A; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:09:20 -0400 Cc: Subject: RE: [lojban] So you think you're logical? Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:59:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <20020618180113.GU19942@bapli> Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14444 >> >All fans of ganai...gi... should perform this test >> >(takes only a few minutes): >> >> As a fan of ganai...gi... in most cases (and proponent of bai), I should >> point out that there are times in English when we say 'if' but mean either >> 'segu...gi...' or 'go...gi...', so the test is imperfect as a result of >> ambiguities in English. However, the particular questions on the test do all >> assume a ganai...gi... if. >> >> I got three of the four right, and one was wrong only because I misclicked. >> >> --la kreig.daniyl. >> >> '.i do cu vanci le ba panje xusra >> .i denci gunma le se gidva' >> >> pygypy gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74 (laldo), 0x22C68020 (citno) >ki'a laldo zo laldo cu dzebau valsi zo tolcitno ni'o mi lonu zo'e mi re lo pada skami mrilu kei to'e djica.