From sentto-44114-14598-1025827385-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Jul 04 17:03:39 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:03:39 z (PDT) Received: from n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.76]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17QGZW-0007f1-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:03:38 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-14598-1025827385-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.194] by n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jul 2002 00:03:06 -0000 X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 5 Jul 2002 00:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 75680 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2002 00:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Jul 2002 00:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m06.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.161) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 00:03:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.21.) id r.1e.2a9a75d7 (4405) for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1e.2a9a75d7.2a563c2f@aol.com> To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:02:55 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1e.2a9a75d7.2a563c2f_boundary" X-archive-position: 126 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pycyn@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_1e.2a9a75d7.2a563c2f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/4/2002 5:08:35 PM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: > IIRC, ri, ra and ru skip sumti of: ri ra ru ko'[aeiou] mi do ti ta tu ... > Additionally, "ra" != "rixire". ra just refers to a further-than-last > sumti, not the next to last. This sounds right, once said, so I withdraw my hope that {ri/a/u} is unambiguous, but hope this avoids the kind of doubling up that Nora suggested. --part1_1e.2a9a75d7.2a563c2f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/4/2002 5:08:35 PM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:

IIRC, ri, ra and ru skip sumti of: ri ra ru ko'[aeiou] mi do ti ta tu ...
Additionally, "ra" != "rixire". ra just refers to a further-than-last
sumti, not the next to last.

This sounds right, once said, so I withdraw my hope that {ri/a/u} is unambiguous, but hope this avoids the kind of doubling up that Nora suggested.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_1e.2a9a75d7.2a563c2f_boundary--