From rizen@surreality.us Thu Jul 25 12:53:10 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ispwest.com ([216.52.245.18] helo=ispwestemail.aceweb.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17Xofd-0004XG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:53:09 -0700 Received: from surreality (unverified [4.47.254.184]) by ispwestemail.aceweb.net (Vircom SMTPRS 1.4.232) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:44:57 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Theodore Reed To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:52:33 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <200207251035.GAA10700@mail2.reutershealth.com> In-Reply-To: <200207251035.GAA10700@mail2.reutershealth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200207251252.36941.rizen@surreality.us> X-archive-position: 297 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rizen@surreality.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2002.07.25 03:23, John Cowan wrote: > Robert LeChevalier scripsit: > > I have tended to reserve my "official" approval, for final products that > > the community as a whole has looked at an also agrees as "good". I also > > like to compliment people for what they have done, as I have done tonight > > regarding some things you have done. > > I think we need to distinguish between official processes and official > products. The stamp "This cuntu is an official LLG process" should > be handed out pretty freely: the President (backed by his board) > should be able to authorize this more or less on the spur of the moment. > (Of course it can be withdrawn if le se cuntu are going too seriously > off the rails, like creating another language or something.) > > OTOH, "This book/program/website/whatever is an official product of > the LLG" should require a whole lot more review. I think dividing > the issue this way should go a long way to satisfying the seemingly > conflicting needs. What about "This attempt at a book/program/website/whatever is an official plan of the LLG"? ;) - -- Theodore Reed (rizen/bancus) -- http://surreality.us:8080/~rizen/ - -~ GPG/PGP Signed/Encrypted Mail Preferred ~- - -- "We were born with a curse. It has always driven us to thoughts which are forbidden. It has always given us wishes which men may not wish. [...] This is our wonder and our secret fear, that we know and do not resist." -- Ayn Rand, Anthem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9QFcBw24JwM4aDNwRAvJhAKCpVxrKsu/gxZ4axp5eDI9eMoPE4ACfW4PS LTM5AhsGfdZ6O0MFrNDl7Z8= =Zg4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----