From phma@webjockey.net Wed Jul 03 11:25:14 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 3 Jul 2002 18:25:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 46896 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2002 18:25:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jul 2002 18:25:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jul 2002 18:25:14 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
	id 17PooT-0002KP-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:25:13 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17PooQ-0002K8-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:25:10 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:25:08 z (PDT)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17PooN-0002Jz-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:25:07 -0700
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 382FF3C510; Wed,  3 Jul 2002 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:24:32 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <0207031322060D.02128@neofelis> <20020703172941.GR2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020703172941.GR2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0207031424320F.02128@neofelis>
X-archive-position: 98
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 14546

On Wednesday 03 July 2002 13:29, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> What's wrong with "la'e di'u"?

That normally refers to at least a bridi, so it would be understood as "The 
dog chased the cat and the chasing got tired". It can't be taken to mean "the 
dog and the cat" unless the first bridi is rearranged.

phma