From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Mon Aug 19 08:02:22 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17go2o-0007cA-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:02:19 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7JF6iex029957
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7JF6i4h029956
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:06:44 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] .uanai ne'i le velcli
Message-ID: <20020819150644.GA29865@allusion.net>
References: <17a.d3e3a0c.2a924947@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <17a.d3e3a0c.2a924947@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 683
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:14:47AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 8/19/2002 5:49:13 AM Central Daylight Time,=20
> lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
[...]
> The question is, first, whether one is here *expressing* an obligation or=
=20
> merely *reporting* that one has (or had) one.  I think that {ei} only=20
> expresses and that this case is too deeply buried to be an expression, he=
nce=20
> the need to state the obligation openly.  Secondly, the question is wheth=
er=20
[...]

I had this same argument with xorxes already on jboste (bau la
lojban. though so it wasn't quite this lame).  Check CLL chapter
2, he's right -- certain attitudinals modify the meaning of the
bridi instead of just expressing how you feel.  ".ei" is one of the
former.

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9YQmDDrrilS51AZ8RAjU0AKCXoMI3Z/b2jCp4ifTi945yROE7kwCeLz7f
h5S9qVjkLrYARnN9e2zZymI=
=vRON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--