From phma@webjockey.net Sat Aug 31 15:21:52 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 31 Aug 2002 22:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 87472 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2002 22:21:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2002 22:21:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2002 22:21:52 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17lGcq-0000EL-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:21:52 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17lGcB-0000E3-00; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:21:12 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17lGc6-0000Du-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:21:07 -0700 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id B4CB53C479; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] dictionary - which words? Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:20:15 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020830094058.0331a8f0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20020831154843.031245f0@pop.east.cox.net> <20020831141418.I30502@miranda.org> In-Reply-To: <20020831141418.I30502@miranda.org> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0208311820150D.03340@neofelis> X-archive-position: 878 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15326 What about {ctelr zei kemxasybakni}? No one would use {kemxasybakni} except in a zei-lujvo, but one would use {xasybakni} by itself. Should there be an entry for {ctelr zei kemxasybakni}, or one for {kemxasybakni}? phma