From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Aug 21 19:18:41 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 15703 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17hhYX-0006ku-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:41 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17hhYN-0006kc-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:31 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17hhYI-0006kT-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:26 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7M2MlIC002015 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7M2Mlnt002014 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:47 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] The number of dogs. Message-ID: <20020822022247.GA1958@allusion.net> References: <0208212116190K.01574@neofelis> <20020822014133.GA1648@allusion.net> <0208212205410L.01574@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0208212205410L.01574@neofelis> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 746 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15194 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:05:41PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 21:41, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > However, you're clearly wrong evidenced by chap18 ex. 18.4: > > mi viska vei mo'e lo'e lanzu ve'o cinfo > > I see (the typical family)-number of lions > > I see a pride of lions. > > > > Given that, and the other discussion on mo'e, the meaning of li mo'e le > > gerku is what you'd expect. (li mo'e ro le su'o gerku -- the count of = all > > the dogs i'm currently describing (i.e., what rlp said)). >=20 > mo'e pa lanzu is the number of members in one family. mo'e pa gerku is th= us=20 > the number of members in one dog, but what does that mean? But the number= of=20 > members in one mole is Avogadro's number. .oi mi cortu le stedu "mo'e pa lanzu" is more likely "one family"... :) --=20 Jordan DeLong fracture@allusion.net --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline [Attachment content not displayed.] --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--