From sentto-44114-15502-1031684542-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Sep 10 12:03:02 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.74]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oqHq-0006nt-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:02:58 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15502-1031684542-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2002 19:02:23 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 19:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 71176 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 19:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 19:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.152) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 19:02:22 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:02:22 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:02:21 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2002 19:02:22.0572 (UTC) FILETIME=[980BFAC0:01C258FC] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:02:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1033 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la pycyn cusku di'e >Quantification does not enter ere at all in any interesting way. From my point of view quantification is the key issue here. >Remember, >in Lojban, all entities are on the same level in the grammar, so it is as >easy to quantify over the members of a set of types or intensions (not >necessarily the same thing, by the way) as of a set of dogs. Yes. That's why {tu'o} is useful to block that ever present quantification when it should not be there. >One hopes that >the type of a thing is not in the meaning of the word for that thing, >because >that will lead to an infinite regress, circling forever around to get out >the >type, given only tokens. Unless you wan to fall back on the bootstrapping >empirical procedure of science and leave a forever incompletely specified >type -- which makes talk of types pretty senseless against other locutions. I certainly have no expectation of having a full specification of a type in most cases. And I wouldn't know where to look for the type other than in the meaning of the word. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/