From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Sep 19 18:30:57 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17sCdC-0007bw-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:30:54 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:30:54 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] interactive story Message-ID: <20020920013054.GI28894@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020916233530.GE29160@digitalkingdom.org> <003801c25f4b$cda31c40$919aca3e@oemcomputer> <20020919012118.GN29160@digitalkingdom.org> <00b401c25fed$a6b590c0$919aca3e@oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b401c25fed$a6b590c0$919aca3e@oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 1379 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 07:43:12AM +0200, G. Dyke wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:43:42PM +0200, G. Dyke wrote: > > > There is only one story line here, so I'm posting it with my various > > > comments: > > > > Gah! > > > > Why not add to it instead!? > > > > > (Robin wrote the first bit to start everything off and the bit about > > > noone being interested, > > > > For the record, the no-one being interested bit was intended as > > silliness. I hope it came across that way. > > I meant in the story, not on the mailing list. > > {no prenu se cinri tu'a le kensa prenu li'o} Yes. That was meant to be silly. I hope it came across that way. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/