From sentto-44114-15966-1032661570-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Sep 21 19:28:46 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n34.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.102]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17swUF-0008Gf-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:28:43 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15966-1032661570-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Sep 2002 02:26:11 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 86791 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.182) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:26:10 -0700 Received: from 200.69.6.18 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10.0558 (UTC) FILETIME=[6A1B71E0:01C261DF] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.18] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 02:26:10 +0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: tu'o usage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1454 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la pycyn cusku di'e ><< > > There never was a difference between {pa lo su'o} and {pa lo ro}, > > so "any more" does not apply. > >> >True, only one thought to hold between {lo ro} and {lo su'o}. Sorry, I don't understand that sentence. >It hasn't come up because, as you well know after hammering away at it, >there >is now no non-importing {ro} I don't remember it being settled and decided (by whom?) the way you want. For me {ro} is non-importing. >(though I cannot remember what the corresponding >nonimporting expression is, it never being one I need). So {ro lo ro >pavyseljirna cu blabi} is just false in this world (and its denial >probably >is too). So for you {ga broda ginai broda} can be false for selected broda? For me it's a tautology. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Home Selling? Try Us! http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/