From sentto-44114-15987-1032691038-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sun Sep 22 03:39:56 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 22 Sep 2002 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.72]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17t49a-0002ol-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 03:39:54 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15987-1032691038-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.94] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Sep 2002 10:37:18 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 10:37:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 52336 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 10:37:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 10:37:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-12.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.112) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 10:37:18 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-69-89.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.69.89]) by mailbox-12.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FD825C16B for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:37:16 +0200 (DST) To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <5a.11ee8a9b.2abe0135@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 11:38:58 +0100 Subject: [lojban] Re: corrigible vlaste? RE: Re: I like chocolate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1474 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list pc: > a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes: > << > > The experimental gismu are silly, but the experimental cmavo aren't. > All the experimental cmavo suggested by me are serious. Most are > brainstormed ideas that deserve to be rejected, but some make a great > improvement to Lojban. > > >> > Well, your entitled to think so (and presumably do if you've gone to > the trouble to present them), but I haven't seen a cse that > convincesme nor one that clearly can't be handled in Lojban as is > (though just how may be less clear). Some of my proposals, such as {sa'ei} are merely useful (in the swiss army knife sense) rather than indispensable. Those that are very useful and lack any clear intrabaseline alternative are mu'ei, ba'oi, ca'ai, ka'ei, nu'oi. > I don't suppose you invent a > new word every time your ingenuity fails you in finding the right way > to say something (at least partly because you don't engage in that > search often -- if at all), but others do and I dislike encoruaging it. In such cases we can just point out the standard solution. --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/