From sentto-44114-16278-1033414306-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Mon Sep 30 12:35:20 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n3.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.86]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17w6K5-0001vz-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:35:17 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16278-1033414306-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Sep 2002 19:31:46 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 30 Sep 2002 19:31:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 8599 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6529B3C47E; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:31:21 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <0209301531110I.30239@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:31:10 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: LOI PRENU GO PA MEI GI KA'E NAI TE JINGA? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1766 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Monday 30 September 2002 12:13, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la and cusku di'e > > >How about {loi prenu go pa mei gi ka'e nai te jinga} > >that sounds pretty coolass to me -- something John might consent to chant. > > Yes, but {lei prenu} rather than {loi prenu}. Any individual > person, any pair, any threesome, can instantiate {loi prenu}. > That says "Some people, united, can never be defeated", not > what we mean. I'm not sure {prenu} is right. I was thinking of {le cecmu jonsi'u na ze'e .ai te jinga}. phma ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/