From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Sep 13 05:12:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 13 Sep 2002 12:12:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 91990 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2002 12:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2002 12:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-7.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.107) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2002 12:12:03 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-189.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.189]) by mailbox-7.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B63327341 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 14:12:00 +0200 (DST) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:13:37 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <5f.2d326696.2ab29c3b@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15645 pc: > dikyjvo (itself a non-literal lujvo, note) "dikyjvo" and "le'avla" are good examples of morphologically well-formed lujvo that despite the faults of their semantic composition have entered the language through force of usage. (I myself use the more modern standard "jvajvo" & "fu'ivla", mind.) --And.