From pycyn@aol.com Thu Sep 12 18:41:07 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 13 Sep 2002 01:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 52809 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2002 01:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2002 01:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r08.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.104) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2002 01:41:06 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.71.25700c0f (3956) for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <71.25700c0f.2ab29c2e@aol.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:41:02 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_71.25700c0f.2ab29c2e_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15634 --part1_71.25700c0f.2ab29c2e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/11/2002 5:35:12 PM Central Daylight Time, lojbab@lojban.org writes: << > I should note at this juncture that Nora (who dates back almost as far as > you pc, and probably further than Chassell) is now a distinct personage > (from me) on Lojban List and the net. She hasn't yet gotten up to posting > on the list (and the current volume is intimidating her against starting), > though perhaps people have noticed her adding to the wiki, but she now is > regularly reading. >> Apologies to Nora, but, as always, she is so *quiet* (and what she finally does say is the more to be valued therefore, I suspect). << I think there are a significant number of non-computer people around, but they aren't the ones arguing the issues. >> The latter is clearly true, though things may be looking up. And I am unsure, given that nothing come out from them, how significant even their numbers are. I'll take Athelstan as spiritually on the side of beauty, truth and light and welcome Ivan, too. --part1_71.25700c0f.2ab29c2e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/11/2002 5:35:12 PM Central Daylight Time, lojbab@lojban.org writes:

<<

I should note at this juncture that Nora (who dates back almost as far as
you pc, and probably further than Chassell) is now a distinct personage
(from me) on Lojban List and the net. She hasn't yet gotten up to posting
on the list (and the current volume is intimidating her against starting),
though perhaps people have noticed her adding to the wiki, but she now is
regularly reading.

>>
Apologies to Nora, but, as always, she is so *quiet* (and what she finally does say is the more to be valued therefore, I suspect).

<<
I think there are a significant number of non-computer people around, but
they aren't the ones arguing the issues.
>>
The latter is clearly true, though things may be looking up. And I am unsure, given that nothing come out from them, how significant even their numbers are. I'll take Athelstan as spiritually on the side of beauty, truth and light and welcome Ivan, too. --part1_71.25700c0f.2ab29c2e_boundary--