From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Sep 09 16:57:27 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 9 Sep 2002 23:57:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 59421 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 23:57:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2002 23:57:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 23:57:25 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.29] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A56699B8007A; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:57:26 -0400 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Archive location. Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:57:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-reply-to: <20020910000003.GA93590@allusion.net> Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.29] X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15453 >I'd just prefer that "balcukta" doesn't become the generally-used lujvo >for "web" (because it sucks much). (I guess tend to prefer more literal >lujvo when possible...). Just because it's not a book, the web can still cukta. I have a jar of hot sauce I made in the fridge. by no stretch of the imagination is it a bottle, but it is a botpi. This is analogous - it is a misleading keyword.