From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Sep 27 16:33:41 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 27 Sep 2002 23:33:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83180 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 23:33:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Sep 2002 23:33:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 23:33:40 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17v4ej-0004pp-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:36:21 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17v4e4-0004oA-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:35:40 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailbox-6.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.106]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17v4e1-0004nS-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:35:37 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-49.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.49]) by mailbox-6.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ABE29F19 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 01:32:18 +0200 (DST) To: Subject: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:33:56 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020927162235.GA28708@allusion.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 1646 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16138 jordan: > After the baseline ends, if there is sufficent desire for it a cmavo > could be created to invert tag scope, so you would say > ro mentu paroi > (for all minutes once). This requires a real grammar change and > such though, so I don't advocate using it until/unless it were to > be adopted into the official grammar after the baseline. > (It would need to add a > term -> sumti tag > rule). Couldn't you just use an experimental cmavo in UI? --And.