From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Sep 16 18:15:28 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 17 Sep 2002 01:15:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 19710 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 01:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2002 01:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 01:15:27 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.29] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A231E6290258; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:15:29 -0400 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] taiku ? Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:15:27 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200209170124.VAA10390@mail2.reutershealth.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.29] X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15750 >> As a member of the generation that uses this like: >> It is not actually freestanding - a grammar has evolved of when it is and is >> not used. >In particular, it is used as a marker of indirect and sometimes even >direct discourse: standard "I said that P" comes out "I'm, like, P." I actually find that usage less commonly than as a marker of secondhand knowledge, but it is used also.