Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 9 Sep 2002 14:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 62487 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 14:34:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2002 14:34:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:34:17 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17oPcI-000630-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:34:18 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oPbk-00062i-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:33:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oPbe-00062Z-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:33:38 -0700 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id F065C3C479; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:33:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: "Newton, Philip" , "'lojban-list@lojban.org'" Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Translation comments requested Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:33:04 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0209091033040F.02338@neofelis> X-archive-position: 995 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15443 Content-Length: 597 Lines: 24 On Monday 09 September 2002 10:23, Newton, Philip wrote: > mi cusku di'e > > > I, Nephi, said > > [...] > > > mi noi se cmene zo nefis. cusku > > Is there a better way to express this? Can I use "mi goi la nefis."? Or > does {goi} only work with KOhA? Or some other cmavo along the lines of > "equivalently" or "also known as"? {mi} is in KOhA, so that's grammatical. It sounds funny, though. Either it means "I'm going to call myself Nephi (which may not be my real name)" or it means "I'm going to refer to Nephi as me (though he may be someone else)". I'd use {no'u}. phma