Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n1.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.64]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17tGwz-0005nB-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:19:45 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16007-1032740226-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Sep 2002 00:17:06 -0000 X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 23 Sep 2002 00:17:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 91868 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 00:17:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Sep 2002 00:17:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2002 00:17:05 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.a4.2c8483d1 (4012) for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:17:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:17:00 EDT Subject: [lojban] Re: tu'o usage Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_a4.2c8483d1.2abfb77c_boundary" X-archive-position: 1495 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pycyn@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Content-Length: 2859 Lines: 63 --part1_a4.2c8483d1.2abfb77c_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/22/2002 4:18:04 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: << > I may have acknowledged that your position is as consistent as any > other choice of import assignment. The way you present it makes > it look as if I had acknowledged it being better, something I do > not now and did not at that time consider to be true. >> Not better, just correct for Lojban (rarely the same, in your view). Do you really, by the way, want {ro da zo'u ganai da broda gi da brode} to be true even if there is nothing in the world at all? --part1_a4.2c8483d1.2abfb77c_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/22/2002 4:18:04 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

<<
I may have acknowledged that your position is as consistent as any
other choice of import assignment. The way you present it makes
it look as if I had acknowledged it being better, something I do
not now and did not at that time consider to be true.

>>
Not better, just correct for Lojban (rarely the same, in your view).
Do you really, by the way, want {ro da zo'u ganai da broda gi da brode} to be true even if there is nothing in the world at all?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_a4.2c8483d1.2abfb77c_boundary--