From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sun Sep 22 04:15:24 2002
Return-Path: <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 11:15:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 45958 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 11:15:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 11:15:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-3.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.103)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 11:15:23 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-147.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.147])
	by mailbox-3.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E9039185F5
	for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:15:21 +0200 (DST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:17:03 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGECHGJAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <02092123232207.02144@neofelis>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 15968

Pierre:
> On Saturday 21 September 2002 23:07, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> li'o
> > Perhaps the rule should be changed so that unfilled sumti places
> > should by default be filled with {zi'o} rather than {zo'e}? It
> > would certainly make some things more intuitive.
> 
> No, they should be filled with {zo'e} so that whatever is implied by context 
> can go there. But in this case, the sumti implied by context is {zi'o}.

I'm sure that the list archives would show that it has been firmly 
established that {zi'o} and {no da} are not permissible values for 
{zo'e}.

--And.