From sentto-44114-16340-1033587042-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Oct 02 12:34:30 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n14.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.69]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wpGO-0005mH-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:34:28 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16340-1033587042-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.197] by n14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2002 19:30:42 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 85585 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.89) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.183] by n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2002 19:30:29 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <122.1825ae68.2acc9c8e@aol.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "jjllambias2000" X-Originating-IP: 200.49.74.2 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:30:29 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: tu'a zo tordu .e zo cmalu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1829 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la pycyn cusku di'e > << > tordu: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju pamoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > jarki: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju remoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > cinla: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju romoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > >> > Thanks. I would tend to say {pamoi ralju} but am open to arguments on that > -- different underlying idions, I suspect (and mine probably English and not > Lojbanically defensible). Just {pamoi le ka ralju} -> {ralju pamoi}. > And I would use {cimoi} rather than {romoi} just because I don't want to > prejudge issues of possible dimensionality (I can see someone young being > small in the temporal dimension, for example). I don't understand how {romoi} prejudges anything here. I was thinking that we can eventually have things being thin (cinla) in four dimensions, five dimensions, etc. And I suspect that's why the gi'uste uses "least significant". mu'o mi'e xorxes ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/