From sentto-44114-16511-1034116014-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Oct 08 20:15:03 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 20:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.70]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17z7JM-0004r9-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 20:15:00 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16511-1034116014-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.96] by n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Oct 2002 22:26:54 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 8 Oct 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70304 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.133) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:26:54 -0700 Received: from 200.69.2.52 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 22:26:54 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2002 22:26:54.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE2FCD60:01C26F19] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.2.52] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 22:26:54 +0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested in Lojban (was: RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2019 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la robin.tr cusku di'e >The two Lojbanisms that really caught on amongst the players >were "mabla" (correct usage) and "le do mamta cu gerku" (incorrect, in >canonical Lojban). What do you call "correct usage" for {mabla}? I assume it was used as a swear word, which I agree should be correct usage. But the official definition says it is used to describe a swear word, not that it is one. ({zoi gy shit gy mabla}, but not {mabla} for "shit!") So it would not constitute correct usage for fundamentalists. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home for Top $ http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/