From sentto-44114-16811-1035470667-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Oct 24 08:51:07 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n31.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.99]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 184kGG-0008Sa-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:51:04 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16811-1035470667-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.97] by n31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2002 14:44:27 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 24 Oct 2002 14:44:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 26931 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 14:44:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Oct 2002 14:44:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-12.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.112) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 14:44:25 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-28.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.28]) by mailbox-12.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7165F309 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:44:11 +0200 (DST) To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:45:51 +0100 Subject: [lojban] la ogYsty. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 X-archive-position: 2307 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I am having difficulty in working out how {la .ogYsty.} can misparse in such a way as to make it illicit. I can't find any way of breaking it down into smaller chunks. Other examples: la .olbyni. la cropcy. la kadiu. la to,ori. The same question goes for {la stylanan.} and {la stailanan}. Given that we want want the phonological structure of cmevla to be as unconstrained as possible, was there any reason why the rule wasn't something like "break the string up into pause- delimited chunks, and then parse those chunks into the smallest possible licit words"? --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home with Ease! http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/jd3IAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/