From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 28 13:44:50 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 186Hgk-00036F-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:44:46 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:44:46 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cfari vs. fanmo Message-ID: <20021028214446.GM6599@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021028201407.GH6599@digitalkingdom.org> <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2347 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:48:58PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Why does cfari not have the incredibly useful second place that fanmo > > does? > > cfari and fanmo aren't parallel in concept. cfari and mulno are. > > I think krasi is the on which is parallel to fanmo. Ah, that makes sense. My problem with krasi is it sounds like it's non-temporal when I read the def'n, but that's probably my problem. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/ la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.