From xod@thestonecutters.net Tue Oct 01 18:36:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 01:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26489 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 01:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 01:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 01:36:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17wYUW-0001Ud-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:39:56 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wYSw-0001U2-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:38:18 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wYSr-0001Tm-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:38:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g921Z0F88809 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:35:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:35:00 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Voice conversations over the net Message-ID: <20021001213347.C88483-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1806 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16295 Is there a way to get whatever internet voice protocol was selected past NAT? -- Before Sept. 11 there was not the present excited talk about a strike on Iraq. There is no evidence of any connection between Iraq and that act of terrorism. Why would that event change the situation? -- Howard Zinn