From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Thu Oct 24 09:26:56 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 84995 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 16:26:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 184kuQ-0000D8-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:32:34 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 184kts-0000Co-00; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:32:00 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailbox-15.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.115]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 184kto-0000Cd-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:31:56 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-7.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.7]) by mailbox-15.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6610D206B2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:25:42 +0200 (DST) To: Subject: [lojban] Re: la ogYsty Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20021024160434.GA44150@allusion.net> X-archive-position: 2309 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16791 Jordan: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:45:51PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > > I am having difficulty in working out how {la .ogYsty.} can misparse > > in such a way as to make it illicit. I can't find any way of > > breaking it down into smaller chunks > > > > Other examples: > > > > la .olbyni > > la cropcy > > la kadiu > > la to,ori > > None of those end in a consonant > > > The same question goes for {la stylanan.} and {la stailanan} > > You can't have "la", "lai", or "doi" in a cmene I meant to ask: "Are they malformed cmene for any other reason than that they violate these two rules?" For example, {la sami} is {la sa mi}, so even if names were allowed to end in vowels, {sami} would still be excluded. Is there a reason why the cmevla rules had to be formulated so as to exclude the above exx? --And.