From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Oct 02 15:00:39 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 22:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 99783 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 22:00:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 22:00:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-14.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.114) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 22:00:39 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-58.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.58]) by mailbox-14.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E7F49B48 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 00:00:37 +0200 (DST) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] bare cmevla Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:02:15 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16321 > la and cusku di'e > > >Can someone remind me what a bare cmevla (flanked by /./) parses > >as? > > It is a text, the highest thing in the hierarchy. It can be preceded > by {nai} and followed by free indicators, quoted with lu-li'u, and > that's about it. Does that mean that if you hit a bare cmevla mid sentence the sentence terminates at that point? > Of course, it would be so much more convenient to have it in BRIVLA... Or KOhA? Baseline aside, would there be a downside to having bare cmevla in BRIVLA or KOhA? --And.