From pycyn@aol.com Tue Oct 29 16:20:28 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 30 Oct 2002 00:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 55884 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2002 00:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Oct 2002 00:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.105) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2002 00:20:26 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.155.16b03f5a (25711) for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:20:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <155.16b03f5a.2af07fc1@aol.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:20:17 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] tirna .e pencu .e sumne .e viska .enai vrusi To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_155.16b03f5a.2af07fc1_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10634 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16856 --part1_155.16b03f5a.2af07fc1_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/29/2002 4:04:16 PM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: << > Why are all the sense words except vrusi agentive? > >> The obvious answer is that {vrusi} is not a sense word, though that leaves the further questions of What is the sense word that goes with this sensation? Of all the sense, taste seems the least separable from the senser, so why was this one selected to in this way? --part1_155.16b03f5a.2af07fc1_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/29/2002 4:04:16 PM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:

<<

Why are all the sense words except vrusi agentive?

>>
The obvious answer is that {vrusi} is not a sense word, though that leaves the further questions of
What is the sense word that goes with this sensation?
Of all the sense, taste seems the least separable from the senser, so why was this one selected to in this way?

--part1_155.16b03f5a.2af07fc1_boundary--