Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n39.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.107]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 1809tH-0003da-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:12:23 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16670-1034381258-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.97] by n39.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Oct 2002 00:07:38 -0000 X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 12 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 13206 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m07.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.162) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.146.368a73 (2612) for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:07:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <146.368a73.2ad8c1c4@aol.com> To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:07:32 EDT Subject: [lojban] Re: Why kez? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_146.368a73.2ad8c1c4_boundary" X-archive-position: 2164 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pycyn@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Content-Length: 2954 Lines: 69 --part1_146.368a73.2ad8c1c4_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/11/2002 6:12:03 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes: << > How come {kei} has a rafsi (kez)? > >> Is the question Why this particular form of rafsi? or Why a rafsi for kei at all? I suppose the answer to the first is"because it doesn't interfere with anything else yet is close to the full form." I haven't a clue about the second, since I can't imagine actually using it in a lujvo --even if {kei} were used in the underlying tanru. --part1_146.368a73.2ad8c1c4_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/11/2002 6:12:03 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:

<<

How come {kei} has a rafsi (kez)?

>>
Is the question Why this particular form of rafsi? or Why a rafsi for kei at all?
I suppose the answer to the first is"because it doesn't interfere with anything else yet is close to the full form." I haven't a clue about the second, since I can't imagine actually using it in a lujvo --even if {kei} were used in the underlying tanru.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_146.368a73.2ad8c1c4_boundary--