Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021003113205.031bfec0@pop.east.cox.net>
Message-ID: <20021003123939.N95321-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net
Content-Length: 1028
Lines: 29

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Robert LeChevalier wrote:


> But what is really needed for the rest of us, is what pc was originally
> doing with his "records" - creating a short summary of what was debated and
> the conclusions that were reached, perhaps with an example.  (pc's records
> at one point started to become contentious enough that they restarted the
> debate, which is I think when he stopped writing them, so records will only
> work for issues on which consensus has been achieved, or where there are
> clear options that can be described with the annotation of "agree to disagree".


Records are fine, but they need to written on a level that all jboka'e can
understand. All the Records I've seen were incomprehensibly dense.


-- 
Before Sept. 11 there was not the present excited talk about a strike
on Iraq. There is no evidence of any connection between Iraq and that
act of terrorism.  Why would that event change the situation?
                                                      -- Howard Zinn