From d95mback@dtek.chalmers.se Tue Nov 19 02:00:43 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:00:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.safelogic.se ([62.119.45.210] helo=mail.safelogic.se)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18E5BP-0005Xl-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:00:39 -0800
Received: from caesar.safelogic.se (caesar.safelogic.se [192.168.100.6])
	by mail.safelogic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E149B6CA
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:00:37 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [lojban] Re: Let's be friends
From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Norb=E4ck?= <d95mback@dtek.chalmers.se>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <3DDA09F6.1000800@bilkent.edu.tr>
References: <20021116225301.QCGE4359.tomts9-srv.bellnexxia.net@Savv>
	<20021116231947.GX17076@digitalkingdom.org> <3DD7720A.208@bilkent.edu.tr>
	<02111721181100.03071@neofelis> <3DD8C870.4020504@bilkent.edu.tr>
	<20021119041902.GA98029@allusion.net>  <3DDA09F6.1000800@bilkent.edu.tr>
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 19 Nov 2002 11:00:37 +0100
Message-Id: <1037700037.9323.5.camel@caesar.safelogic.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-archive-position: 2633
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: d95mback@dtek.chalmers.se
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

tis 2002-11-19 klockan 10.52 skrev Robin Turner:
> snuge'i = snura + gleki = "safe kind of happiness" - my attempt at an 
> approximation of "glad" in the context of "I'm glad I don't use Windows" 
>   (because I've just received a Windows virus).

coi rodo

I'm new to this list, and haven't posted anything, but some of you may
have seen me in the IRC channel as norpan.

Anyway, I'm just wondering about this snuge'i lujvo. Why did you find it
neccessary to create a lujvo? Why not just use snura gleki?

What are peoples opinions on creating lujvo? I would say that when a
tanru is sufficient, it makes no sense creating a lujvo, since the place
structure is up to debate, and you need to know rafsi to decode it.

mi'e norpan