From sentto-44114-17280-1038595319-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Nov 29 10:42:37 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:42:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.88]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Hq5u-0005e7-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:42:30 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17280-1038595319-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.194] by n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Nov 2002 18:41:59 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 29 Nov 2002 18:41:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33833 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 18:41:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2002 18:41:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 18:41:58 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 269B13C705; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:41:55 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129015947.03165ec0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <0211291341530J.02982@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:41:53 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2767 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Friday 29 November 2002 13:01, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 08:20 AM 11/29/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >I don't use the TLI alternate orthography, so when I write {srutio}, I > > don't mean {sruti'o}. > > But if srutio is a valid word, then it has to be usable by those who DO you > the alternate orthography. > > >But there is a word which jbofi'e accepts and which has one > >of those diphthongs: {ckankua}. If this is in fact invalid, then jbofi'e > > has a bug. > > 1. jbofi'e is not an official LLG standard. > 2. ckankua fails the slinku'i test what about {cipnrxakuila}? phma To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/