From olivera@macs.biu.ac.il Mon Nov 25 08:03:25 2002
Return-Path: <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>
X-Sender: olivera@macs.biu.ac.il
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 25 Nov 2002 16:03:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 96142 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 16:03:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2002 16:03:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.cc.huji.ac.il) (132.64.1.18)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 16:03:25 -0000
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with SMTP
	id E9C793FE6A; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:03:23 +0200 (IST)
Received: from cc.huji.ac.il (cc.huji.ac.il [132.64.1.5])
	by mail2.cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE87B4017D
	for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:03:23 +0200 (IST)
Received: from avitallap (di8-652.dialin.huji.ac.il [132.64.15.152])
	by cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with SMTP id C094C4900
	for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:03:21 +0200 (IST)
Message-ID: <003e01c294d5$f51eda60$0300a8c0@avitallap>
To: "lojban" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <sde2471e.044@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Is .e == .ije?
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:56:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
From: "Avital Oliver" <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=60925700
X-Yahoo-Profile: mivmai
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17193

From: "And Rosta" <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
> >>> Avital Oliver <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il> 11/25/02 10:35pm >>>
> #> You could say {mo mi e do}. In this case {mo} surely must
> #> have precedence, and it must expand to something like
> #> {mo mi ije go'i do}.
> #
> #Actually, it would be {mo fi mi e do}. Other than that I like your
solution.
> What would be {mo fi mi e do}? What's wrong with {mo mi e do} and
> {mo mi ije go'i do}?
Sorry, I totally sux0red. I meant {mo fa mi e do}.