From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Nov 07 08:02:59 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Nov 2002 16:02:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 25580 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 16:02:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Nov 2002 16:02:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.249)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 16:02:59 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:02:58 -0800
Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:02:58 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: importing ro
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:02:58 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F249hEUsebmspH2q6Dq00000370@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2002 16:02:58.0971 (UTC) FILETIME=[24664EB0:01C28677]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 16994


la pycyn cusku di'e

>1.  There are four fundamental quantifiers in Lojban: {ro, su'o, no,
>me'i[ro]} (I intend to make sure that the default origin for {me'i} is 
>{ro},
>if it is not already).

That would be a good default. If I remember correctly though, CLL
gives {pa} as a blanket default for every PA that neeeds one.

A slightly more systematic form for the quantifiers would
be {ro, no, za'u[no], me'i[ro]}. However, {za'u[pa]} is
useful as a plural marker, and we are all too used to {su'o}
to be worth the change.

Another systematic series would be {ro, no, su'o[pa], su'e[da'apa]}.

>2.  They are related as follows
>subalterns: ro => su'o
>                 no => me'i
>contraries: ro => naku no (and so, if you can't do the numbers, no => naku
>ro)
>subcontraries: naku su'o => me'i (and so naku me'i => su'o)
>contradictories: naku ro <=> me'i
>                       naku su'o <=> no
>  (and so            naku no <=> su'o
>                       naku me'i <=> ro)
>When there is a guarantee that the subject term is non-empty,
>                       no => ro naku
>                       me'i => su'o naku

Yes, that's all clear. You are using the set (A+E-I+O-)
for the forms {Q broda cu brode}.

I prefer (A-E-I+O+) for those forms, which give the rules:
    ro <=> no naku <=> naku su'o naku <=> naku me'i
and, when there is a guarantee that the subject term is non-empty,
    ro => su'o
    no => me'i

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail