From sentto-44114-17230-1038409005-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Nov 27 12:06:06 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from n30.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.87]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18H8Rf-0003K9-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:06:03 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17230-1038409005-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.201] by n30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Nov 2002 14:56:45 -0000 X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: Lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 27 Nov 2002 14:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 94866 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2002 14:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Nov 2002 14:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2002 14:56:43 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:22:40 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:57:07 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 To: Lojban From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:56:59 +0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2716 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list [I've removed crossposting; restore it in the reply if you see fit] A couple of questions. First, does a vote in favour count as a vote in favour of the general thrust of the document, or as support (or lack of dissent) for every detail of it? Second, I have a query about the following passage: # The language design freeze will last for a minimum 5 years after its # initial declaration, and may be extended on a year by year basis until such # time as discussion of language problems, and potential changes to fix # those problems, is substantially discussed in Lojban by skilled users of the # language. When that situation is deemed to occur, the question of # maintaining the baseline, or terminating the freeze in the language # prescription will be turned over to the Lojban-using community. Is it saying that (a) the freeze will be for a minimum of 5 years and (b) thereafter, LLG will decide how long it continues, and (c) once discussion is mainly in Lojban by skilled users, LLG will abdicate its powers vis a vis the baseline and freeze? --And. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/