From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Nov 25 08:33:56 2002
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 25 Nov 2002 16:33:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 61089 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 16:33:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2002 16:33:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 16:33:54 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
          Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:59:46 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
          with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:34:08 +0000
Message-Id: <sde25100.000@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:33:35 +0000
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Is .e == .ije?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17194

>>> Avital Oliver <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il> 11/25/02 10:56pm >>>
> #Actually, it would be {mo fi mi e do}. Other than that I like your
solution.
> What would be {mo fi mi e do}? What's wrong with {mo mi e do} and
> {mo mi ije go'i do}?
Sorry, I totally sux0red. I meant {mo fa mi e do}.
---------------------------------

I still don't see anything wrong with {mo mi e do}, unless for some weird
reason you want the answer to be nothing but a predicate in which mi e do=20
fills the x1.

--And.