From sbelknap@UIC.EDU Fri Nov 29 14:47:57 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: sbelknap@uic.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 29 Nov 2002 22:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 75205 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2002 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO birch.cc.uic.edu) (128.248.155.162) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 22:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28168 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 22:47:48 -0000 Received: from dial0-174.dialin.uic.edu (HELO uic.edu) (128.248.170.207) by birch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 22:47:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:47:54 -0600 Subject: Re: [lojban] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com To: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021126233258.0333f540@pop.east.cox.net> Message-Id: <9941A95E-03EC-11D7-BAFA-000393629ED4@uic.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) From: Steven Belknap X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810567 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17260 The lojban baseline policy statement does not appear to explicitly address the relationship between lojban and Loglan. The implication is that the Loglan language and community is irrelevant to the new baseline policy. Prior to voting, I would like comment from lojbab and other movers/shakers on this issue.