Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from n22.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.78]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 189z2c-0004PT-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:38:38 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17043-1036721958-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2409 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.105) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:17 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.cb.2add9654 (26116) for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 230 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:14 EST Subject: [lojban] Re: importing ro Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary" X-archive-position: 2521 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pycyn@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Content-Length: 1892 Lines: 43 --part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 5:26:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes: << > That's why I listed (2) as something we can agree on. Or at least we > can agree on it enough that the issue of import dies as a bone of > contention. >> But it appears that we do not agree on even this (nor on what happens in an empty universe). So this particular effort to circumvent or change the basic Logic/Lojban frame fares no better than the others. Mayhap we don't want to be "compromised" out of an established position. --part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 5:26:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:
<<

That's why I listed (2) as something we can agree on. Or at least we
can agree on it enough that the issue of import dies as a bone of
contention.

>>
But it appears that we do not agree on even this (nor on what happens in an empty universe). So this particular effort to circumvent or change the basic Logic/Lojban frame fares no better than the others. Mayhap we don't want to be "compromised" out of an established position.

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary--