Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 30 Nov 2002 15:39:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69003 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 15:39:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Nov 2002 15:39:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 15:39:49 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18I9if-00057Y-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 07:39:49 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18I9iW-00057C-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 07:39:40 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 30 Nov 2002 07:39:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.117.111.139] (helo=ultinet.org) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18I9iJ-00056n-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 07:39:27 -0800 Received: from avitallap (132.64.10.54) by pandora with [XMail 1.9 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:39:11 +0200 Message-ID: <003a01c29886$88f4f630$0300a8c0@avitallap> To: Cc: References: <003401c29885$d8bd1d60$0300a8c0@avitallap> Subject: [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 10:37:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-archive-position: 2790 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: biomass@shpich.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Avital Oliver" Reply-To: biomass@shpich.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=131207876 X-Yahoo-Profile: mivmai X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17281 Content-Length: 159 Lines: 9 > zo'e MEANT_TO_BE lenu loi nanmi cu gletu loi nanmu This was, of course, SUPPOSED TO BE