From sentto-44114-17552-1039057440-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Dec 04 21:43:25 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.82])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18JonC-0000gB-01
	for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:43:22 -0800
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17552-1039057440-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.194] by n26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2002 03:04:00 -0000
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 03:04:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 92686 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 03:03:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 03:03:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 03:03:59 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id D69673C48C; Wed,  4 Dec 2002 22:03:50 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com (lojban)
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <200212041952.OAA24256@mail2.reutershealth.com>
In-Reply-To: <200212041952.OAA24256@mail2.reutershealth.com>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
Message-Id: <02120422034808.01986@neofelis>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:03:48 -0500
Subject: [lojban] Re: response to And
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 3053
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Wednesday 04 December 2002 14:37, John Cowan wrote:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> > Is the sentence "This teddy is a cribe" 100% true? Not if cribe
> > means 'bear'.
>
> Well, in fact I find the sentence "This teddy is a bear" perfectly
> reasonable and am quite ready to believe it.  To me, bears are categorized
> as the brown/grizzly, the American black, the polar, the panda, and the
> stuffed. And perhaps other categories, and indeed Irene's Larry is +stuffed
> +polar. So for me "la laris. pe la .airin. cribe" is true.

What about the covalent and rectangular bears?

phma

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/