From xod@thestonecutters.net Sun Dec 08 15:18:20 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LAgj-0007XR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:18:17 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB8NHmf97167 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:17:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:17:48 -0500 (EST) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: More stuff In-Reply-To: <20021208231452.GA26904@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20021208181700.X95494-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3316 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:24:29PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > > > On the contrary, it has already been a problem. TLI Loglan had it > > with their numbers (which are ni ne to te fo fe so se vo ve), which > > Bob Chassell and others had problems with, so I made the Lojban set > > what it is now - yet people object to re/rei. > > s/people/thinkit/ It is the only criticism of his in which I find value. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.